This is really interesting, but as you might anticipate, it is filled with confident untrue statements. Not as many as I expected tbh, but plenty once you start looking, especially into anything that might be a bit niche!
This is super super interesting! Thanks for doing it. It immediately made me think something analogous could exist for programming questions - like a Stack Overflow, where I publish *both* sides of my ChatGPT conversations about programming, and they're shared and rated and curated.
Some feedback so far:
* I couldn't find the edit button. The pencil wasn't very obvious to me! And I was expecting to edit the whole article, and it be a button in the top navigation bar.
* Upon editing, I couldn't see the prompt!! It just lets me add to the prompt? I can't find a way to view the existing prompt. Which is not that fun. What's the reasoning behind not letting people edit a prompt? Or even see the prompt as far as I can tell?
I love the idea of a 'obliterate' button to tag hallucinations - that could be kind of fun
This is really interesting, but as you might anticipate, it is filled with confident untrue statements. Not as many as I expected tbh, but plenty once you start looking, especially into anything that might be a bit niche!
This is super super interesting! Thanks for doing it. It immediately made me think something analogous could exist for programming questions - like a Stack Overflow, where I publish *both* sides of my ChatGPT conversations about programming, and they're shared and rated and curated.
Some feedback so far:
* I couldn't find the edit button. The pencil wasn't very obvious to me! And I was expecting to edit the whole article, and it be a button in the top navigation bar.
* Upon editing, I couldn't see the prompt!! It just lets me add to the prompt? I can't find a way to view the existing prompt. Which is not that fun. What's the reasoning behind not letting people edit a prompt? Or even see the prompt as far as I can tell?
Thanks!